Write a Review

King Kong movie reviews

• King Kong

  Sunday, December 25, 2005 1:24:03 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  whats wrong with u haters!!!!! This movie isn`t even close to cheesy. Sure its impossible but it lets ur imagination go beyond anything u have ever seen. YOU BETTER WATCH THIS MOVIE IT DESERVES MORE THAN 5 STARS. the graphics, plot and acting was excellent. Don`t bring kids under the age of 11.l This movie has some violent, bloody and disgusting scenes. BUT OTHER THAN THAT. AWESOM, EXCELLENT,MIND-BLOWING,BEST-MOVIE-EVER,!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

• King Kong

  Saturday, December 24, 2005 9:32:49 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  A job well done to peter jackson and naomi watts and the rest of the crew. It was so heart breaking at the end though and the first hour seemed a bit pointless. Overall 4.5/5 stars.

• King Kong

  Saturday, December 24, 2005 7:15:24 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  Amazing Film. But not long enough. That is right, not LONG ENOUGH. If the movie was amazing for 2 hrs, can you imagine if there was another Hour? Look at LOR 1, 2 & 3 Good Job Peter, J

• King Kong

  Saturday, December 24, 2005 3:40:47 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  I just saw this movie for a second time last night and I cried again. All the girls will have to bring some tissues. The emotion in Kong`s eyes just get to you, the cast did an excellent job. I saw the oringal 1933 movie the other day, it`s noting compared to this one. I enjoyed the fact that in this movie the character Anne Darrow was not a "victim" and didn`t just scream the whole time. She understood him. Best movie I`ve ever seen, I really don`t like love stories that much and I loved this one.

• King Kong

  Saturday, December 24, 2005 12:05:03 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  it was a great movie however they could cut off some parts with dinosaur. I think that part meaningless and made the movie too long.

• King Kong

  Saturday, December 24, 2005 7:33:29 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  King Kong is worthless! The only reason critics have been giving it 4 to 5 stars is because they are all affraid of being the one to shoot down he who made the Lord of the Rings! Interactions between the ape andthe girl are long, wordless and boring. The dinosaurs look less really (If not to say totally fake) then in the original Jurassic Park (You`d think that after a decade, they would be better!). None of the main carachters is able to attract the sympathy of the audience. Sure, Kong looks allot more real then in previous incarnations: But that does not make a movie! In all: Peter Jakson`s King Kong isn`t woth your money! Better to

• King Kong

  Saturday, December 24, 2005 2:17:56 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  call "king kong" number one!!!

• King Kong

  Friday, December 23, 2005 11:21:56 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  this film was good. but could have left out the scene in the New York... that ruined the film.

• King Kong

  Friday, December 23, 2005 10:45:27 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  to many stare downs between a woman and a gorilla! also to long!!! good fight scenes though

• King Kong

  Friday, December 23, 2005 7:48:11 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  King Kong is the best film of 2005