Write a Review

King Kong movie reviews

• King Kong

  Friday, January 6, 2006 7:00:20 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  The dialogue was infantile and not very good. The classic making of a film for the weak minded. Scenes were short in duration with no time for even a plausible theme or character development. Cinematography was not of average quality. The story began very slowly and when the crew reached the destination of Skull Island it became more ridiculous. In my opinion the original( 1933) was better and the acting was superior. My advice--don`t waste your money.

• King Kong

  Friday, January 6, 2006 5:21:07 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  Please rename this movie King Long. Cause this movie takes a 1 hour story and somehow finds a way to add 2 more hours!?!? WHAT!? Scene upon pointless scene is added to this movie. I mean how many times can you show 5 minutes of a giant gorilla sitting there doing nothing!? Well according to Peter Jackson you can do it at least 10 times in 1 movie. The only thing i cared about is where the heck Billy came from. I love these movies where people die left and right and you see very little effect of it on the survivors are the emotionless robots? Jack Black should stick to roles where he plays a goof. Cause even when he is trying to be a

• King Kong

  Friday, January 6, 2006 4:19:02 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  I enjoy the movie with my partner,I really enjoy the part after they meet,and she was trying to intertain kong so he would eat her,and once she came exhausted, he still wanted her to continue, and got made when she didn`t,my partner enjoy it as well being and ex navy man,tried to tell them how to reverse the boat,I almost had to slap him. smile,but we enjoy it alot, that I will see it again.

• King Kong

  Friday, January 6, 2006 4:00:40 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  it was cool i loved it

• King Kong

  Friday, January 6, 2006 1:11:39 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  I do not recommend this movie. Every aspect of it was taken WAY to far, and it left us rolling our eyes saying "oh, come on!". Kong was very well done, but overall it was a waste of 3 hours.

• King Kong

  Friday, January 6, 2006 12:02:36 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  THE GREATEST MOVIE OF 2005!!!!!! HAD THE BEST SPECIAL EFFECTS AND A GREAT STORY!!!!

• King Kong

  Friday, January 6, 2006 11:10:10 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  Great movie I felt it toke to long to get to the Kong, a lot of movie leading up to it.Shorter movie would be more enyoyable.

• King Kong

  Friday, January 6, 2006 4:15:43 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  very boring

• King Kong

  Friday, January 6, 2006 1:45:40 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  i agree with the person who said "i guess peter jackson can`t make a movie less than three hours long." that person was on to something. has anyone noticed how peter jackson`s films sort of lack romance?

• King Kong

  Friday, January 6, 2006 1:39:00 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  i thought the movie was kind of cool. yeah, it was unnecesarily wrong, yes, there was too much CGI, but hey...an ape falling in love with a woman...that`s got to touch SOMEBODY. it was sweet. long, but sweet.