Write a Review

28 Days Later movie reviews

• 28 Days Later

  Wednesday, July 9, 2003 9:44:52 AM | (age group: 25-34) | M

  You people who say it sucked, were expecting it to be a scary, horror movie as it`s being advertised. It shouldn`t have been advertised that way. It is definetely more sci-fi. It wasn`t scary, it was more of a `what if` sort of movie. What if it did happen? It was more creepy that anything. I just thought it was on some 12 Monkeys sort of vibe. Weird and different than most of the movies that are out now. That`s the reason why I liked it. But from the reactions of the people who left the theatre they either really liked, or they thought it was great. This movie was under-cover great...only for smart, intelligent people!

• 28 Days Later

  Tuesday, July 8, 2003 10:32:53 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  hmmmm... not bad.

• 28 Days Later

  Tuesday, July 8, 2003 11:15:48 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  The only question this movie made me ask was "Why Did they say it was scarey". It`s not jump-out-of-your-seat scarey. But it`s not even remotely pschologically scarey. The concept that a virus speards is not scarey. It happens every day. The fact that Britain cannot communicate with other parts of the world is ridiculous. This movie was dumb

• 28 Days Later

  Tuesday, July 8, 2003 11:08:23 AM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  I loved it to pieces. The way it was shot gave it a creepy feeling that I thought was great. All the reflections over the shot were interesting to look at. If you like this movie, read The Day Of The Triffids by John Whyndm since it`s basically the same story and interesting to compare the two. Not really all that scarry, but a good physcological thriller. Makes you leave the theater asking questions. 5 stars.

• 28 Days Later

  Monday, July 7, 2003 9:55:04 PM | (age group: 2-17) | M

  NOT SCARRRRRRRY AT ALL IT SUCKKKKKKKKKED

• 28 Days Later

  Monday, July 7, 2003 9:12:56 PM | (age group: 25-34) | F

  Intense!!!!!!!!!!!

• 28 Days Later

  Monday, July 7, 2003 5:52:46 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  horrible movie

• 28 Days Later

  Sunday, July 6, 2003 11:53:25 PM | (age group: 18-24) | M

  Well, it would appear "The Exorcist" remains the champion. I believe it`s the barenaked ladies who sadi it best with "It`s all been done before." Sam Raimie and Stanley Kubrick would be spinning in their graves. All in all mediocre at best, wait for video. NOT SCARY IN THE SLIGHTEST, and not at all probable. If you want to be scared watch the exorcist.

• 28 Days Later

  Sunday, July 6, 2003 6:15:48 PM | (age group: 18-24) | F

  If you like philisophical movies that holds a deep meaning than this is the movie for you..It wasn`t scary at all..but it was disturbing because it could actually happen

• 28 Days Later

  Sunday, July 6, 2003 6:05:31 PM | (age group: 18-24) | M

  GARBAGE GARBAGE GARBAGE GARBAGE !!!!!!