Write a Review

Jurassic World movie reviews

• 10

  Jurassic World

  Thursday, July 30, 2015 9:24:31 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  Scary and cool

• 7

  Jurassic World

  Tuesday, July 28, 2015 12:36:32 AM | (age group: 50 or over.) | M

  Not bad it was worth seeing.

• 4

  Jurassic World

  Friday, July 24, 2015 5:53:49 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  kids: Bad! She: Worst! Owner: Terrible! He: Good! Dinos: Regular!

• 2

  Jurassic World

  Wednesday, July 22, 2015 2:38:26 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  This is the worst movie I've seen in a long time. To begin the film's title is misleading in that it all takes place in another park, not world. The plot is ridiculous, really terribly stupid in context of the rest of the series, essentially a rehashing of the first plot. Bryce Dallas Howard's character is simply unlikable. In fact her character is almost identical in every way to the would-be villain but for the fact that she is physically attractive and the main character (Chris Pratt) inexplicably likes her. The whole movie is irrevocably stupid. So very bad.

• 1

  Jurassic World

  Monday, July 20, 2015 4:41:21 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  Horrible! I regret wasting time/$$ on this... the plot was moronically simple throughout, except at the end where the dinosaurs make and break alliances by working in teams with (a) other dinosaurs, and (b) humans... everyone betrays everyone! Mind-boggling, to say the least... SAVE YOUR MONEY!

• 2

  Jurassic World

  Saturday, July 18, 2015 2:46:46 PM | (age group: 2-17)

  This movie is very bad and laughable. The first idea is that the animals can be trained, the are used for military purposes and have become self aware. Most of the people were laughing and a few walked out.

• 3

  Jurassic World

  Friday, July 17, 2015 12:17:35 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  An absolute cheese fest! A stretch of the imagination - train velociraptors to do your bidding - yeah, right!! Bad script but good visual effects. Not worth $18. The first Jurassic Park will always be the best.

• 7

  Jurassic World

  Tuesday, July 14, 2015 6:51:07 PM | (age group: 35–49) | M

  The storyline was pretty good. The acting mediocre at best. The two kids didn't play great, and neither did Bryce what's her name.

• 6

  Jurassic World

  Tuesday, July 14, 2015 12:37:41 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  In my opinion it was good, and could have been better. Would have liked to have some humour in it (ie. Jeff Goldblum in the first two films, was funny), a more scary and edge of your seat action/drama. In Jurassic Park you felt the dinosaur roar, it was scary and fantastic at the same time. If there is another one, I hope it's better than this one. Christ Pratt, was very good.